When t = 0, the initial condition tells us that x = 0, so x'(0) = 1 and we see that x(t) > 0 for small t. Suppose for some positive t we have x(t) 0. Then there is a least positive number T such that x(T) = 0. Then x'(T) = 1, which leads to a contradiction because x(t) > 0 for t < T. We deduce that x(t) > 0 for all t.
Now x' - 1 = x(x - 2t) and since x'(0) = 1, we see that x - 2t < 0 for small t. We deduce that for t sufficiently small, x(t) < t, consequently y(t) < 0 for small t. We now claim that y(t) < 0 for all positive t. If this is not the case, then there is a least positive number T such that y(T) = 0, and then we must have y'(S) = 0 for some S with 0 < S < T. But from y' = (y - t)(y + t) and (y + t) > 0, we would have to have y(S) = S, a contradiction because y(S) < 0. We deduce that x(t) < t for all positive t.
Now consider x' = x(x - 2t) + 1. Note that we cannot have x'(t) 0 for all t, because then x - > 0 as t - > which is clearly impossible, consequently x' takes on negative values. Next we have x'' = 2(xx' - tx' - x), so if x'(t) = 0, we see that x''(t) < 0. We deduce that if x'(T) < 0, then x'(t) < 0 for all t > T. Thus there is a positive number T such that x'(t) < 0 for all t > T. Now differentiate again to obtain x''' = 2(xx'' + x'x' - tx'' - 2x'). Then we see that if x''(t) = 0 and t > T, then x'''(t) > 0, consequently there is a positive number S > T such that either x''(t) < 0 for all t > S or x''(t) > 0 for all t > S. We deduce that x'(t) is monotonic increasing or decreasing for t > S and hence limt - > x'(t) exists (possibly infinite).
We now have x'(t) is monotonic and negative for t > S, yet x(t) > 0 for all t > S. We deduce that limt - > x'(t) = 0 and the result follows.
l22 | = | (l - x)2 + y2 + 2(l - x)ycosq | |
l12 | = | x2 + y2 - 2xycosq |
Suppose this is not the case. Let bn = Sm = 1nam(2/9)m. If a = 2/3 or , then there exists a positive integer N such that bN < 1/3 and bN + 11/3. Then the same argument as above gives