Results 2000 Virginia Tech Regional Mathematics Contest |
37 schools took part in the 22nd contest and there were 229 participants. The maximum possible score was 70. The leading scores were (if anybody has any objections about putting these leading scores on the WEB, please inform the Contest Director immediately!)
Score | Name | Institute | Graduation | Major |
49 | Miller, Carl A | Duke University | 2001 | Math |
45 | Curtis, Nathan G | Duke University | 2002 | Music |
43 | Lacker, Kevin D | Duke University | 2002 | Math/CS |
38 | Arthur, David G | Duke University | 2004 | ? |
38 | Groft, Chad L | Univ MD College Park | 2002 | Math/CS/Phys |
30 | Kaseorg, Anders | High School | ||
25 | Mermin, David L | Duke University | 2004 | Math |
23 | Katines, Matthew P | Rose-Hulman Inst. Tech | 2002 | Math |
22 | Cherveny, Luke E | NC State University | 2002 | Appl Math/Phys |
22 | Colsher, Michael J | Duke University | 2001 | Math |
20 | Johnson, David R | NC State University | 2003 | Math/CS |
19 | Barry, Patrick A | NC State University | 2004 | CS |
19 | Siegel, Adam F | Duke University | 2004 | Math/Econ |
19 | Mason, Jonathan F | University of SC | 2003 | Math/CS |
17 | Lanut, Matthew K | Carnegie-Mellon Univ | 2002 | CS |
17 | Hooper, William P | Univ MD College Park | 2001 | Math |
17 | Cheong, Raymond | Univ MD College Park | 2002 | Chem Eng |
16 | Rohde, Robert A | Univ MD College Park | 2001 | Phys/Math |
16 | Fulton, Brian I | High Point University | 2001 | Math |
16 | Weston, Laura J | NC State University | 2001 | Chem/Math |
15 | Watts, Andrew M | US Naval Academy | 2004 | ? |
14 | Mamce, William A | Carnegie-Mellon Univ | 2003 | Math |
14 | Lynch, Greer M | US Naval Academy | 2004 | ? |
14 | Godshall, Jonathan R | Duke University | 2003 | Phys/Math |
14 | Wong, Daniel K | Duke University | 2003 | Math/Comp |
14 | Zahrn, Frederick C | Duke University | 2002 | Math |
14 | Kim, Allen W | Virginia Tech | 2002 | Elec Eng |
The score distribution was
Score Range | Number of Contestants |
40 and above | 3 |
30 to 39 | 3 |
20 to 29 | 5 |
15 to 19 | 10 |
10 to 15 | 72 |
5 to 9 | 65 |
1 to 4 | 38 |
0 | 33 |
The order of difficulty of the problems indicated by the scores, starting with the hardest, was 3,2,6,1,4,5,7.
Details of the scores of all the participants of each of the individual schools will be sent out in the next week. However if you want them now, please contact the contest director Peter Linnell and he will be able to give you them. Also distribution of prizes will be announced in the next week.
I would like to thank all the schools who took part, and I hope you will all take part again next year. I also hope that many schools who did not take part this year will take part next year. Watch these WEB pages; even if you do not get an invitation, we will still be delighted for you to take part provided you fill in the registration forms before the closing date for entries.
On very limited feedback so far, it seems that the problems were a shade too difficult, and therefore the exam maybe slightly easier next year. Comments on this are welcome. Also much more of the organization of the exam will be done electronically. Occasionally announcements about the competition will be posted in the newsgroup sci.math. Otherwise no substantial changes in the format of the exam are planned.