- The number of Sylow 5-subgroups is congruent to 1 mod 5 and divides
99, so if G does not have a normal Sylow 5-subgroup, it has 11
Sylow 5-subgroups and hence 44 elements of order 5.
The number of Sylow 11-subgroups is congruent to
1 mod 11 and divides 45, so if G does not have a normal subgroup of
order 11, it has 45 subgroups of order 11 and hence 450 elements of
order 11. If G does not have a
normal Sylow 3-subgroup, then there are at least 10 elements of order
a power of 3. We now see
that G has at least
44 + 450 + 10 = 504 > 495, too many elements,
and it now follows that G has normal Sylow p-subgroup for p = 3,
or 5, or 11, as required.
If G does not have a normal Sylow 3-subgroup, then it
has either a normal Sylow 5-subgroup or a normal Sylow
11-subgroup. Suppose G has a normal Sylow 5-subgroup A. Then
G/A is a group of order 99, and therefore G/A has a normal
subgroup B/A of order 9, because the number of Sylow 3-subgroups in
a group of order 99 is 1. Since | B| = 45, the number of Sylow
3-subgroups of B is 1 and we deduce that B has a characteristic
subgroup C of order 9. We conclude that
C⊲G as required.
On the other hand if G has a normal Sylow 11-subgroup D, then
G/D is a group of order 45 which has a
normal subgroup E/D of order 9. Then E is a group of order 99
and the number of Sylow 3-subgroups is 1, consequently E has a
characteristic subgroup F of order 9. It follows that G has a
normal subgroup F of order 9 as required and the proof is complete.
- Let
f∈ℤ[x] be a monic polynomial of degree n. We
will show that I = (f ). If this is not the case, then we may
choose
g∈I∖(f ) with smallest possible degree.
Clearly
g≠ 0 and therefore
deg(g)≥n, so we may write
g = amxm + am-1xm-1 + ... + a0 where
m = deg(g) and
am≠ 0. Then
m≥n and
g -amxm-nf∈I
and has degree strictly less than
m, so we have a contradiction and the result is proven.
- To show that
ℚ/ℤ⊗I = 0, it will be
sufficient to show that every simple tensor
x⊗y = 0.
Choose
n∈ℕ such that nx = 0.
Since I is injective, we know that nI = I, so there exists
z∈I such that nz = y. Then
x⊗y = x⊗nz = nx⊗z = 0
as required.
- By the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a PID,
invariant factor form, we may write
M = Rd⊕R/Rt1⊕...⊕R/Rtn
where
t1| t2|...| tn≠ 0. Here
T ≔R/Rt1⊕...⊕R/Rtn is the torsion submodule of M.
First suppose
C≌R. Then M is not a torsion module, so
d≥1 and we may write
M = R⊕S, where
S = Rd-1⊕T. Then
M/S≌R and it follows that we have an epimorphism
M↠C.
Now suppose
C≇R. Then C is a torsion module, so
C⊆T. Since tnT = 0, we see that tnC = 0 and we deduce
that
C≌R/sR where s| tn. Since there exists an
R-epimorphism
R/tnR↠R/sR and R/tnR is a
direct summand of M, we deduce that there exists an R-epimorphism
M↠C, which completes the proof.
- (a)
- Let
G = Gal(K/ℚ). Note that G has a subgroup H of
order 10, for example the normalizer of a Sylow 5-subgroup, because
the number of Sylow 5-subgroups is 6. Let F denote the fixed field
of H. Then
[F : ℚ] = 6 and by the primitive element
theorem,
F = ℚ(p) for some
p∈F.
Let f denote the minimal
polynomial of p over
ℚ. Then f is irreducible,
deg f = 6, and the splitting field for f is a Galois extension of
ℚ contained in K. Since A5 is simple, the only
Galois extensions of
ℚ contained in K are
ℚ
and K, and we deduce that K is the splitting field of f.
- (b)
- Complex conjugation is an element
γ of G,
because K is a Galois extension of
ℚ. The order of
γ is 2, because K is not contained in the real numbers, and
the fixed field of
γ is R. Therefore [K : R] = 2 and we
deduce that
[R : ℚ] = 30.
- (c)
- By considering its action on the roots of f, we get an embedding of
G into S6. If
γ is an odd permutation,
then the even permutations yield a subgroup of index 2 in
G, which is not possible because
G is simple. It follows that
γ is an even
permutation of order 2, so it must be a product of two 2-cycles. We
deduce that f has exactly two real roots.
- (d)
- From (c), let a, b be the two real roots of f. Then
ℚ(a, b)⊆R. Since
6|[ℚ(a, b) : ℚ] and
[R : ℚ] = 30, we see that
either
[ℚ(a, b) : ℚ] = 6 or
[ℚ(a, b) : ℚ] = 30. If the latter is true, then we
must have
R = ℚ(a, b) as required. On the other hand if
[ℚ(a, b) : ℚ] = 6, then the corresponding subgroup
for
ℚ(a, b) has order 10 in G and therefore must contain
a 5-cycle
σ. But then
σ can only fix one root and we
have a contradiction.
- Let A be the given matrix.
The characteristic polynomial f of A must be
x3 + x2 + ax + 1,
where a = 0 or 1. First suppose a = 0. Then
f (x)≠ 0 for
x = 0 or 1 and we see that f has no linear factor. It follows that
f is irreducible and it we deduce that the rational canonical form
for A is the companion matrix for x3 + x2 + 1, that is
Now suppose a = 1. Then
f (x) = (x + 1)3 and we see that there are
three possibilities for the invariant factors, namely
{(x + 1)3},
{(x + 1)2,(x + 1)} and
{x + 1, x + 1, x + 1}. The corresponding
rational canonical forms are
Thus there are four possible rational canonical forms, as described
above.
- Representatives for the conjugacy classes for A4 are
(1), (1 2 3), (1 3 2) and (1 2)(3 4). The sizes of the conjugacy
classes are 1, 4, 4 and 3 respectively. Let V denote the Sylow
2-subgroup of A4, a normal subgroup of order 4 consisting of 1 and
the fourth conjugacy class above. Then A4/V is a group of order
3, so it has 3 one-dimensional representations, and hence A4 has 3
one-dimensional representations. Since A4 has 4 conjugacy
classes, it has 4 irreducible representations. Thus A4 has one
more irreducible representation, which will have degree 3, because
the sum of the squares of the degrees of the irreducible
representations of A4 is
| A4| = 12. Let
ι denote the
trivial character, let
α,β denote the two other degree 1
characters, and let
χ denote the irreducible degree 3 character.
Let
ω = e2πi/3 = (-1 + i√3)/2 denote a primitive
cube root of 1. Then the character table is
Class Size |
1 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
Class Rep |
1 |
(1 2 3) |
(1 3 2) |
(1 2)(3 4) |
ι |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
α |
1 |
ω |
ω2 |
1 |
β |
1 |
ω2 |
ω |
1 |
χ |
3 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
The character
χ is derived from the rest of the character table
and the orthogonality relations.